2026 – a year of UFO UAP focus, history and ongoing research
During 2025 and 2026 two events that were featured prominently in my “OZ Files” history, namely the 1966 Tully “saucer nest” saga and the 1966 Westall affair, will be focuses of anniversary celebrations during 2026, which each in their own unique ways are extraordinary testaments and reflections of their respective 60 year legacies.
I will be a guest speaker at Australia’s only UFO festival – the Australian UFO Festival, Cardwell, Queensland, 6-9 August 2026, focusing on the Tully “saucer nest” incident.
Here is how I covered the Tully event 30 years ago:
1966 was a major year for UFO activity in Australia. The UFO landing at Horseshoe Lagoon near Tilly, far north Queensland, is one of the best known accounts of an apparent UFO landing report. It introduced the term UFO ‘nest’. The locality saw further UFO sightings for many years. The RAAF files describe the famous Tully incident in the following manner.
‘At about 9.00 a.m. on 19 January 1966, Mr George Pedley, a banana grower of Tully, Qld, observed a light grey non-reflecting dull object, reported to be about 25 feet long and eight feet deep, rise vertically then climb above marshland which was situated about 25 yards away. There was a hissing noise which decreased as the object rose. The apparent shape was described as “two saucers, face to face”, but no structural detail was observed. Pedley only saw the object for 15 seconds and it disappeared in mid-air whilst receding into the distance.
‘A clearly defined, near circular, depression remained in swamp grass at the point from which the object was seen rising, and measured about 32 feet long by 25 feet wide. The grass was flattened in clockwise curves to water level within the circle and the reeds had been uprooted from the mud. There was no scorching of grass or surrounding trees and the observer stated that there was no smell of combustion.’
The following details are from the police report which Pedley filled out with Sergeant Moylan of the local police. Because so many conflicting claims have been made about what Pedley said at the time, it is worth quoting the actual report.
‘Observer reported this matter to Tully Police at 7.30 p.m. on 19/1/66 and at 7 a.m. 20/1/66 went with me to the site of the depression in the swamp. His version then included the information that the object rose vertically, appeared to dip slightly and then went off in straight climbing path. He then said that there was no smell of combustion and no scorching of grass or trees visible; that the flattened grass or rushes was quite green when he first saw the depression; on his return that afternoon the grass had turned brown.
‘In this matter I formed the opinion that the depressed area in the swamp grass had been caused by a small helicopter and that the observer, in the early morning bright sunlight shining on the rotor may have mistaken the shape. His description of the takeoff lent some strength to my opinion. However, there was cleared land to the east for about 200 yards where such an aircraft could have more safely landed instead of the position indicated by the observer, close to trees. Later 1 was informed by Wallace Evans of Tully, an electrician, that he has seen similar markings in a swamp at Kurrumine Beach and is quite certain that it was caused by a whirlwind, sucking up water into a waterspout, uprooting the grass and laying it out in a similar pattern. At 3.30 p.m. 21/1/ 66 I took a sample of the grass at the site and have forwarded it under separate cover.’
According to the Secretary of the Department of Air, Mr A.B. McFarlane, on 11 February 1966: ‘Investigations of the area surrounding the reported “nests”, testing of samples taken from around them and interrogation of persons involved in the report failed to reveal anything of significance. However, during enquiries a number of local residents stated that the reported “nests” are fairly common during the onset of the “wet”. Furthermore, the University of Queensland stated that there was nothing unnatural in the samples submitted and assessed that the “nests” could have been the result of severe turbulence, which normally accompany line squalls and thunderstorms prevalent in North Queensland at that time of the year. There is no explanation for the visible phenomena reported but it could have been associated with or the result of “down draughts,” “willy willies” or “water spouts” that are known to occur in the area.
‘In January of this year a number of photographs taken from an airfield in the tropics offer a fine example of the type and growth of cloud formation occurring with a severe “down draught”. This whirling mass of tropical air associated with thunderstorm activity, may, on reaching the earth’s surface, dissipate and subside. Or it may persist, giving rise to dust eddies, water spouts, etc, and leaving a telltale circular pattern on the ground.
‘Should it occur over a swampy reed bed the effect would be to flatten the reeds with a circular pattern. Resultant photographs and investigations of the “nests” seem to fit in with this theory and is accepted as a possible cause of the phenomena.’
The Tully affair has been mentioned extensively in the UFO literature over the years, and many inaccuracies and misconceptions have developed. These problems became more critical when the incident became linked to the English ‘crop circle’ controversy. The prominent schools of thought on the crop circle formations adopted the Tully incident as a classic example of their perceived explanations for the circle complexes. For various reasons the comparison is invalid. These reasons are too complicated to be gone into here, but include obvious differences such as that the events at Tully occurred during the day, while the English crop circles are made at night.
For further detailed coverage of the Tully saga since this 1996 write up in “The OZ Files” book, look through my online blog “The OZ Files” at http://theozfiles.blogspot.com/
The 1966 Westall case will also get a lot of attention in 2026. Shane Ryan tells me he should be getting his book on Westall ’66 out around the time of reunion and local library events during April, 2026. I hope to be able to make that event. The iconic ABC TV program “Australian Story” will be running their Westall ’66 story to coincide with the April 2026 60th anniversary. I participated in the program’s development. Film maker Zev Howley includes coverage of the case in his documentary “The Man who saw them arrive – the Colin Cameron story”.
From the documentary description:
“In January 1968, the quiet life of Melbourne resident Colin Cameron was shattered following a mysterious encounter on Kew Boulevard. Obsessed with uncovering the truth, Colin documented strange phenomena and shared his experiences with those closest to him as the events grew increasingly intense and dangerous.
“Told through the eyes of his cousin Andrea, who honours a promise to share his story, The Man Who Saw Them Arrive recounts Colin’s journey, presents first-hand accounts of Australia’s most famous UFO sightings (including Westall 1966) and provides insights from leading UFO researchers. A haunting exploration of mystery, memory, and unanswered questions hidden in Melbourne’s backstreets.” “Starring Andrea Lee Stavrianos, Colin Cameron, Julie Ann Cameron, Bill Chalker, George Simpson, Dan Huebel, Michael O’Callaghan, Dion Voss.”
I have watched the finalised version – It pivots around a fascinating but troubling vision of Colin Cameron’s strange encounter that would descend into very weird directions. The film’s first outing will be at the Melbourne Science Fiction Festival on March 5. From my files I supplied Zev with a copy of John Pinkney’s “The Outer Limits” column coverage in the Melbourne Truth 1979: “Saucer ring mystery”.
I plan to write further on this very strange affair. I am advised the film will also be aired at the August Australian UFO Festival.
I wrote up the 1966 Westall events back in my 1996 book “The OZ Files” as follows:
THE WESTALL SCHOOL SENSATION
Two days after the Burkes Flat incident, Victoria was the setting of a UFO sensation. This time there were numerous witnesses and the sighting occurred in daylight. Despite the extraordinary nature of the incident only fragmentary details emerged and it has been suggested by some witnesses and researchers that there were attempts to prevent details of the case from being made public. At about 11 a.m. on 6 April 1966 numerous schoolchildren and some teachers at Westall High school, in Clayton, a Melbourne suburb, observed a UFO which landed nearby. An account by one of the students appeared in the school magazine, the Clayton Calendar.
‘I was in class when the disturbance occurred outside. I didn’t take any notice and when the bell went for morning recess my classmates and I went to our lockers and then walked out into the yard. We noticed that all the girls who were doing Physical Education were gathered right down near the end of our playing field. Suddenly the school came alive with excitement and everyone began running down towards where the girls were. I was among the surging mob. I had seen something that looked very unusual in the sky.
‘As I looked up I saw a dazzling, silvery object flying around some pine trees which grew on a ridge about a quarter of a mile directly behind the school. It then flew across some open pad- docks also behind the school and returned to the pines. On the other side of the ridge there is a small field. The thing hovered over the pines and descended behind them and must have been directly over the field. I then lost sight of it because of the pines.
‘As the thing was out of sight I began to notice many private aircraft, mainly Cessnas, flying towards the pines. The thing reappeared and rose to the level of the approaching aircraft. This enabled me to get a rough idea of its size. It was a silvery object as long as one of the Cessnas, but very thin.
‘As the aircraft approached, the thing tilted on about a 45 degree angle and started to move into the distance, gradually gaining height. The planes increased their speed and began
to follow it, but the object streaked away leaving the planes far, far behind. The planes turned back, and we all stood hoping it would return but it didn’t, so we all went into school, 15 minutes late.
‘After school two friends and I went to the field where the object had descended. In a few minutes we were crawling under a barbed-wire fence which surrounded the field at a height of about four feet. We waded through the waist-high grass making for a gap in it. Suddenly we were there. We found ourselves standing in a spot where the grass had been utterly crushed against the earth. It was an area of about 25—30 feet in diameter. Cows could not have done it because the fence was barbed, and also cows would have left a track through the grass. There was no track. The object had descended over the field; could it have done this? It all leads back to the same question. What was the object? Some people say it was a weather balloon, but do weather balloons go up and down quickly, crush grass and fly across the skies faster than reasonably speedy aircraft? Otherwise, your guess is as good as mine.’
The Dandenong Journal, a local newspaper, attributed the following information to Mr Greenwood, the school’s science teacher: ‘He said five light aircraft were circling the object and were flying at a relatively low altitude. The aircraft had played a “cat & mouse” kind of game with the object. He described the object as like a thin beam of light, about half the length of a light aircraft. It was silvery-grey and seemed to thicken at times.
‘The thickening was similar to when a disc is turned a little to show the underside. The object was never really stationary. It seemed to move from side to side and up and down.
‘At first there was one plane apparently observing the object. Later, Mr Greenwood noticed five aircraft which attempted to follow the object as it occasionally accelerated back and forth from east to west. Mr Greenwood first saw the object when it rose into the air from behind pine trees near the school. After about 20 minutes (at about the end of morning recess) Greenwood looked away, and when he looked back it had disappeared.’
The paper reported that one pilot. Bob Ford, indicated he had been flying ‘somewhere in that area’ at the time, but did not see My thing unusual. No other pilots were found who indicated they had been in the area and saw something. Another student, Marilyn Eastwood, described the object as ‘round, with a hump on top and round things underneath’. Still another witness, Ms A, described to me how she had seen three UFOs that day. According to her, two of them had landed, and she had seen two large circles of flattened and burnt grass. She indicated their width was about 15 metres across. She recollected how the military had arrived at their house the next day. Her mother, and brother went in a truck with her to the landing site. They were told to stay in the truck while the military investigated. They took samples of earth. Ms A recollected overhearing a RAAF officer saying that the earth must have been subjected to extreme heat, as it had been burnt. The military were insistent that the family say nothing about what they had witnessed. While her mother has since died, her brother partially confirmed the story. He had been about three years younger than his sister, and was attending the adjacent primary school. A woman who was serving in the tuck shop at the time of the commotion also saw the UFOs.
A school prefect years later described to Dr Ian Gordon, who was then working in the Victorian Education Department curriculum development section, how he had been in a chemistry class during the incident. He and other students, and teachers, had seen through the windows what seemed to be a silver-blue object of a ‘classic flying saucer shape’, come down behind a group of pine trees in an undeveloped area, not more than 200 metres from Fairbank Road. There had been two objects according to what he had heard but he only saw what seems to have been the first of these.
All of a sudden everyone in the sports class, including some of the teachers, took off in a south-west direction. According to the prefect, the thing had come down behind a group of pine trees, and everyone had run off in a mass evacuation of the school, all ‘after a flying saucer’. A large area of flattened grass was found there, perfectly circular in shape, about 10 metres in diameter, with three scorch marks. The grass was very dry, but it
hadn’t started a fire. A man approached the school group, and told them all ‘to piss off because it was private property. The property had been standing idle for many years. The man walked through the area of flattened grass and seemed to ‘ignore its existence’, according to the prefect. When he was told by numerous screaming children that a flying saucer had come down there, he said ‘bull shit’ and various other things. The school children eventually returned to the school, accompanied by a number of teachers who had ‘followed the mass exodus’.
The prefect was berated by the school principal for being ‘irresponsible’ in following the rest of the students and teachers. Students were forbidden to talk to the press. Some students were interviewed in Rosebank Avenue, near the school. There was a phone call to the principal. He made an announcement that no such thing had been seen and put it down to ‘mass hysteria’.
There were allegedly a couple of unmarked planes, aluminium coloured, seemingly silent, flying over the area at the time, very slowly. The prefect indicated that from the time of the thing coming down to when the school group arrived at the landing site had been little more than five minutes. It was gone when the group arrived. The prefect indicated there had been a secondary mark with no scorch marks to the south of the main site, which suggested that a second object may have landed. That object had been seen coming down very shortly after the first. The site was not flattened right down like the main one. It appeared to be just a swirled pattern in the grass in an anti-clockwise direction. Some students said they saw the object take off after it had come down, but most seem to have only seen something come down and later sighted the ground traces. There was apparently talk with some teachers, according to the prefect, that the craft must have been some sort of secret Air Force test weapon.
Ray Fischer of the Victorian UFO Research Society revealed to me that they had interviewed a man who came on the scene at about 5 p.m. of the day of the sightings. He saw a ‘a perfect circle of flattened grass, flattened right down to ground level, in grass that was about two feet high’. This man recollected that he thought the area was about 10 metres in diameter. He returned a few days later to find a team of ‘military or Air Force people’
going over the site. A couple of technical-looking vans were parked outside. He saw that people in uniform were examining the circle with radiation detectors. Officials there told him he couldn’t go into the field and to move on. This gentleman returned to the site a third time, only to find that the paddock had been burnt out.
Several other events are alleged to have been related to this fascinating affair. Some witnesses described seeing a cow in the paddock, where the UFO came down. It was alleged to have been in such a distressed state that it eventually had to be put down. There have been persistent stories that one schoolgirl, the first student to arrive at the landing site, was found be in a dazed, trancelike state, as if she was very shocked. There were unconfirmed rumours that this girl never fully recovered from this experience and spent some time in a hospital at Kew. A teacher who took photos of the site was allegedly told by the headmaster that ‘if you want to keep on teaching you have to keep your mouth shut and we want the film’. The film allegedly ended up in the hands of the RAAF or Army, but there has been no confirmation of that detail.
A woman claimed the UFO involved in the Westall school landing had hovered over her house, above trees, before it landed behind the school. The UFO was allegedly above the trees for five or 10 minutes before it landed. The woman claimed the UFO ‘was trying to find a place to land’. She states she followed it, but that ‘it started to get a bit spooky’. She started to return home, but then went back, only to be turned away by police. One source indicated that 200 to 300 kids raced down to the fence where the UFO had landed. There was ‘some guy walking around in white overalls and he was telling everyone to keep back and another guy appeared and he had some sort of uniform. Both men had overalls—one was fully white—the other had a dark uniform, but it had an emblem or a logo on it.’
According to that source, these men were normal-looking, and seemed to be walking around the UFO on the ground. ‘One of the guys disappeared into the aircraft—the one on the ground—they didn’t see where the other one went—the last they saw, he was around the other side of them. They disappeared.’ It was alleged by at least one
source that the UFO had ‘sort of crash landed’, that there were three ‘aircraft hovering above it. They were white—they didn’t have wings and they didn’t have engines—all they did was hum. The humming got louder when they took off. Then within a few minutes, this “flying saucer” took off.’
There is little doubt that something of an extraordinary nature was seen over the Westall school area and that at least one of these objects appears to have landed and apparently left behind some physical traces. Numerous witnesses confirm these basic details. Other more exotic details vary in credibility, some seemingly complementing each other and some apparently contradicting the generally accepted story of events.
Beyond this 1996 coverage I have covered further development on my OZ Files blog. Shane Ryan’s Facebook site “Westall Flying Saucer incident”: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1966westallflyingsaucerincident
It is a focus on the case for witnesses, researchers and interested people.
There are a lot more things that will attract my attention in 2026 – a year already steeped in UFO UAP matters that present themselves variously in the domains of UFO reality or UFO theatre. Which domain is in the eye of the beholder.


